Facebook Twitter

What We Are Calling For




We are calling for the Government to mandate a rigoruous public scientific hearing, judged by indepedent experts from the relevant fields of science, to ban the cruel and failed practice of animal experiments as claimed predictive models of human patients.

This science hearing is outlined in Parliamentary Early Day Motion 25 and supported by Peter Egan, Ricky Gervais, Dr. Jane Goodall and Chris Packham together with Jane Fallon, Paul O'Grady, Rick Wakeman and Rumer.

Ricky Gervais is promoting the science heairng in his conversation with medical doctor Ray Greek, at this link https://vimeo.com/376532872

Dr. Jane Goodall released a filmed statement February 2017, in support of such scientific scrutiny; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDaMPJVVssI In her film, Dr. Goodall cites a precedent medical victory by Dr. Greek when he defeated plans by Cambridge University to build a multi-million pound primate laboratory with a precedent ruling against the lab on 'national interest, medical and scientific grounds.' Cambridge wanted to build their lab on Green Belt land and failed to prove that the required need 'in the national interest' was demonstrated by their proposed experiments. For more on this historic ruling please visit this link.

Current science has evidence proving exactly how and why experimenting on animals is harming the progress of human medicine. Yet there has never been a Government-mandated public science hearing, judged by indepedent qualified scientific experts, to expose the outdated and false medical claims which perpetuate and fund the horrific cruelty of experimentation on animals.

Media channels such as BBC's Newsnight have broadcast programmes where animal research scientists have been challenged by animal rights activists, but science itself is not animal cruelty! Science is science,  and as such, scientists - as well as the public audience - deserve a level playing field: scientist versus scientist.

In addition, experiments on animals are sanctioned by law as a scientific practice, in contrast with one that would otherwise be prosecuted as cruelty to animals if it occurred outside the environment of an animal laboratory.

Furthermore, even the late Professor Colin Blakemore, one of the UK 's leading proponents of  animal experiments, described his activity as "evil". In Professor Blakemore's own words: "I hate working with animals, I think it's wrong, and I think it's evil but for now I think it's necessary, and a scientist must have honesty and integrity and be accountable".

Although Professor Blakemore insisted that a scientist must "be accountable", he never agreed to take part in a properly mderated public scientific debate.

This lack of open dialogue came to a head in September 2000 during a live interview  introduced by acclaimed broadcaster Sue MacGregor, on BBC's Radio 4's The Today Programme. For this item, Professor Blakemore was interviewed together with co-author of Animal Models in Light of EvolutionDr Ray Greek MD. During the interview, Dr Greek invited Professor Blakemore to a series of 5 to 7 live medical debates to cover all areas of human illness. Without hesitation Professor Blakemore refused to take part, instead suggesting that Dr Greek attend the Boyd Group, a closed-door discussion group (which no longer exists), and one that would not have enabled the British public to hear, or participate in the event.

If a scientist supports a practice that can only be viewed via harrowing undercover investigations - such as the one narrated by Dr Jane Goodall DBE, below - then he or she must indeed, in Professor Blakemore's own words, "be accountable"  to prove that the chosen scientific method is helping the progress of human medicine.

FOR LIFE ON EARTH is committed to making this level of science scrutiny happen. Our objective is to ensure that our called-for science hearing is broadcast live on television, via a platform such as BBC's Newsnight or Question Time, both being suitable for the seriousness of such an important topic, and able to incorporate audience participation.


FOR LIFE ON EARTH focuses on the most efficient routes by which to advertise the fact that veterinary principles must not be applied to ill, or critically ill humans. Veterinary surgeons train at entirely different institutions than human medical doctors - and there's a life and death reason for that. Our effective pressure campaign, coordinated with the help of our supporters and the international community, is driving the need for legislative decisions made by governments to implement current scientific knowledge. This will, in turn, help to release funds available for medical research and re-direct these precious, finite resources towards Personalised Medicine  - the front runner of cures for human disease where treatments are tailor-made for you and you alone - for your unique genetic makeup.   


We are delighted that Dr Ray Greek was invited by the EU Commission to testify at the EU Parliament on behalf of an historic Citizens Initiative (CI) on May 11th 2015, the CI is titled 'Stop Vivisection to Save Human Lives'. This was created by 1.273 million EU citizens who submitted their private passport details, ID numbers, birth dates and postal addresses to sign a formal petition to enable this medical hearing; you can listen to Drs Greek and Menache presenting their evidence against animal models for human patients below:

FOR LIFE ON EARTH  is working to free governments from the grip of lobbying groups that represent the laboratory animal model community. Not only will these individuals be asked to take part in our called-for science hearing, but we will also continue to utilise the best routes to submit up-to-date scientific evidence to Parliaments, internationally.


A precedent scientific ruling was set in 2002 at the historic Cambridge Inquiry, when permission for Cambridge University to build a new non-human primate laboratory was refused. Dr Ray Greek was appointed chief scientific witness against the use of animal models, because Cambridge University wanted to build their new lab on Green Belt land and therefore had to prove that experimenting on non-human primates was 'medically and scientifically in the national interest'. After a two week inquiry, including the submission of Dr Greek's referenced position paper in addition to his five hours of oral witness testimony, the Government Inspector ruled:

On the basis of the technical input, therefore, I could not conclude that need in the national interest is demonstrated insofar as this pertains to the scientific/medical research and procedures undertaken by the University.

The primate laboratory was not built.